|
Investment Banking >>> Transaction Opinions |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
| Company |
 |
Provider of a full range of
physician and allied health professional staffing and management
services to hospitals |
 |
| Background |
 |
Due to the changing dynamics
of the healthcare industry, the company experienced substantial
operating losses in recent years as government reimbursement
programs and private insurance programs sought to contain and
reduce medical costs. Day-to-day operations, as well as certain
acquisitions, were funded with debt capital, resulting in significant
fixed obligations in an environment characterized by significant
profitability pressures. |
 |
| Issues |
 |
Although the company's stock was publicly
traded on the OTC Bulletin Board System, the stock was thinly
traded, lacked institutional sponsorship and lacked coverage
by institutional research analysts. |
 |
| |
 |
Given the company's current size, lack of
profitability and uncertain future prospects, the company realized
all of the costs of being a public company (i.e., public disclosures,
reporting requirements, etc.) without any of the benefits (i.e.,
access to capital markets, institutional sponsorship, etc.). |
 |
| |
 |
The purchaser in the transaction was the
company's chairman and CEO, as well as the company's majority
shareholder. |
 |
| |
 |
Other alternatives
explored but ultimately deemed unfeasible included a complete
or partial sale of the business to a third party, the spin-off
of a portion of the business into a separate public company,
recapitalizing the company and liquidating the company. |
 |
| D&P's Role |
 |
Served as financial
advisor to the Special Committee of the Board of Directors of
the company |
 |
| |
 |
Assisted the Special
Committee in evaluating and negotiating the terms of the merger
transaction |
 |
| |
 |
Rendered an opinion
concerning the fairness, from a financial point of view, of
the consideration to be received by the stockholders in the
merger transaction. |
 |
| Results |
 |
The Special Committee determined
that the terms of the merger were fair to the stockholders and
recommended that the Board of Directors accept the offer. |
 |
| |
 |
The Board of Directors unanimously
approved the merger, concluded that the consideration to be
received by stockholders was fair and recommended that the merger
be submitted to the company's stockholders for approval. |
 |
| |
 |
The transaction also received stockholder
approval. |
 |
 |
 |
 |