Article
Fairness Opinions: Do They Matter for Your Privately Held Clients?
By Jeffrey M. Gordon
Managing Director, Duff & Phelps, LLC
Special to Accounting Today

As key advisors to businesses large and small, accountants routinely help clients avoid or manage risks. But one often-overlooked way to help clients manage risk is to advise them on obtaining fairness opinions affirming that a sale or merger transaction is fair to the company's shareholders from a financial point of view. Although such opinions are a fact of life in deals involving public companies, there are often compelling reasons for privately held businesses to obtain them as well. Armed with knowledge from the fairness opinion, the client will be better able to make an informed decision about a change-of-control transaction and avoid potential disaster down the road.

Fairness Opinions - A Primer
As the level of merger and acquisition activity grew exponentially over the past three decades, the fiduciary duties of the company board of directors came under increasing scrutiny. The development of SEC regulations and key court decisions, especially in the 1980s, highlighted the need for boards of public companies (including but not limited to those being acquired) to make an informed decision using the Business Judgment Rule. In essence, boards had to exercise due care, act in good faith and in a disinterested manner, and not abuse their discretionary position.

These requirements have led boards to hire financial advisors to act as independent third parties, not only to assist the directors in the decision-making process, but also to provide evidence that the board has complied with the Business Judgment Rule. The fairness opinion has become the universally accepted instrument used to effectively prove such compliance.

B ack to Top